|University of Leicester|
Until recently, professor of management at Aalto University in Helsinki. His research has long been on the role that information plays in innovation and in change more generally. He is general editor of Prometheus, a journal that takes a critical stance in its attitude to innovation.
These papers - one proposition paper and ten responses - comprise a debate on shaken baby syndrome. This is the hypothesis that a Triad of indicators in the head of a dead baby reveal that it has been shaken to death, and that the killer was the person last in charge of the baby. The debate was scheduled to have appeared in Prometheus, a journal concerned with innovation rather than matters medical. It struck the editors of Prometheus that a hypothesis that had survived nearly half a century and was still resistant to challenge and change was well within the tradition of Prometheus debate. The debate focuses on the role of the expert witness in court, and especially the experiences of Waney Squier, a prominent paediatric pathologist, struck from the medical register in the UK for offering opinions beyond her core expertise and showing insufficient respect for established thinking and its adherents. The debate’s responses reveal much about innovation, and most about the importance of context, in this case the incompatibility of medicine and the law, particularly when constrained by the procedures of the court. Context was also important in the reluctance of Taylor & Francis, the publisher of Prometheus, to publish the debate on the grounds that its authors strayed from their areas of expertise and showed insufficient respect for established thinking.
Prometheus shaken baby debate
The shaken baby debate - Stuart Macdonald
Shaken baby syndrome: causes and consequences of conformity - Waney Squier
Shaken baby syndrome: a fraud on the courts - Heather Kirkwood
Shaken baby: an evolving diagnosis deformed by the pressures of the courtroom - Susan Luttner
Waney Squier’s ordeal and the crisis of the shaken baby paradigm - Niels Lynøe
Another perspective - simply my brief thoughts - Dave Marshall
Has Squier been treated fairly? - Brian Martin
Commentary on the paper by Waney Squier: ‘Shaken baby syndrome: causes and consequences of conformity’ - Michael J Powers
Waney Squier and the shaken baby syndrome case: a clarion call to science, medicine and justice - Toni C Saad
The role of the General Medical Council - Terence Stephenson
When experts disagree - Stephen J. Watkins
The General Medical Council’s handling of complaints: the Waney Squier case - Peter Wilmshurst